AIGR™ AI Governance Ratings

A governance opinion backed by a controlled evidence record.

The analytical score and the published rating designation are separate layers. The score supports diagnostics and trend analysis; the AIGR designation communicates an approved governance opinion within a defined scope and date.

Rating scale

Seven designations, plus Not Rated.

The designation is categorical. It is not a percentage, probability, credit rating or safety guarantee.

AIGR-100Exemplary governanceLeading maturity
AIGR-90Advanced governanceHigh confidence
AIGR-80Established governanceEstablished
AIGR-70Developing governanceImprovement required
AIGR-60Emerging governanceMaterial remediation
AIGR-50Limited governanceHigh concern
AIGR-40Critical governance concernUrgent review
AIGR-NRNot ratedInsufficient scope, evidence or conditions
Controlled lifecycle

A governed decision process, not a one-time questionnaire.

01IntakeFix organization, system, sector and scope.
02ClassifyDetermine risk context and evidence pathway.
03AssessReview controls, evidence and material deficiencies.
04ReviewChallenge evidence, judgment and exceptions.
05RateApprove designation, rationale and conditions.
06MonitorTrack validity and change triggers.
Scope definition

Every rating fixes five scope parameters.

Entity

The accountable legal entity and business unit.

System

The named AI system, version and intended use.

Lifecycle

The stage assessed, from development through production.

Jurisdiction

The regulatory context applied to the assessment.

Period

The evidence window and point-in-time assessment date.

Boundary

An AIGR rating is an opinion on governance maturity and evidence confidence. It is not certification, accreditation, legal advice, regulatory approval, audit assurance, a safety guarantee or a credit rating.